Skip to content

Low-Code Platforms Reimagined

Low-code promised to put power in everyone’s hands. Instead, most enterprises got half-built apps, clunky portals, and runaway license bills. Kinetic takes a different path: orchestration first, experiences that people actually adopt, and a pricing model that scales with value, not with seats.

What is a Low-Code Platform or LCAP?

Low-code application platforms (LCAPs) let organizations build apps quickly with visual drag-and-drop tools. They target “citizen developers” and are meant to speed up app delivery while reducing reliance on hard-to-find coding talent.

They’ve been popular because IT backlogs never shrink, and business teams want agility. Vendors like Appian, Mendix, OutSystems, and Microsoft Power Apps dominate the category, often marketed as the cure for digital transformation delays.

But there’s a catch: low-code apps often stall after pilots, lack enterprise-wide adoption, and create new silos instead of solving the old ones 

Typical strengths of LCAPs:

checkmark
Faster prototyping and deployment of forms, apps, and portals
checkmark
Visual workflow builders for common processes
checkmark
Empowering business teams to build without deep coding knowledge
checkmark
Strong ecosystems of prebuilt components and connectors

Kinetic vs Low-Code / LCAP

How does the Kinetic platform stack up against LCAPs?

The Experience

Low-Code / LCAPs:
Vendor-imposed portals; limited customization; inconsistent UX across apps.

With Kinetic:
Headless, “Own the Glass” architecture — you design portals with React/Angular/Vue, no vendor templates

Process Orchestration

Low-Code / LCAPs:
Good at app-level workflows, weak at cross-system orchestration.

With Kinetic:
Agility Layer orchestrates end-to-end processes across IT, HR, Finance, legacy + cloud

Integrations

Low-Code / LCAPs:
Connector libraries, but often limited to what vendor provides; tricky with legacy.

With Kinetic:
Open, API-first integration layer with on-prem agents and custom handlers — no rip-and-replace

Scalability

Low-Code / LCAPs:
Seat-based licensing; costs balloon as adoption grows.

With Kinetic:
Consumption-based pricing — unlimited users, cost scales with workflow runs

AI Readiness

Low-Code / LCAPs:
Each vendor bolts AI into its own suite; siloed and inconsistent.

With Kinetic:
Treats AI as a horizontal layer that plugs into orchestration, not a bolt-on

Adoption

Low-Code / LCAPs:
Many pilots never reach scale; portals feel clunky.

With Kinetic:
Experience-first approach drives real self-service adoption (USDA, DISA, Fairfax, GreenState case studies)

Competition

Who are the other platforms in the Low-Code/LCAP category?

How Kinetic compares: We don’t compete on how fast you can throw together another app. We compete on adoption, orchestration, and scale. Kinetic wraps around the stack you already have, unifies experiences, and ensures workflows actually run enterprise-wide.

Appian

Strong in workflow + case management, but heavy licensing and prescribed UI

Pega

Broad BPM + AI suite, but costly and complex to implement

OutSystems

Known for robust enterprise apps, but developer-centric and creates lock-in

Mendix

Business-friendly collaboration tools, but limited in enterprise orchestration

Microsoft Power Apps

Easy entry point for citizen developers, but brittle at scale and tied to the MS stack

Stop building apps people won’t use. Start orchestrating experiences people love.

Empower Your Organization Today
components-cta-forms